Radioactive dating methods are best used to
From his research, our evolutionary geologist may have discovered that other geologists believe that Sedimentary Rocks A are 200 million years old and Sedimentary Rocks B are 30 million years old.Thus, he already ‘knows’ that the igneous dyke must be younger than 200 million years and older than 30 million years.It is clear that the sedimentary rock was deposited and folded before the dyke was squeezed into place.By looking at other outcrops in the area, our geologist is able to draw a geological map which records how the rocks are related to each other in the field. Is a 6,000 year age for the earth based on different facts than a billion year age for the earth? It's interesting that these same tests, when used on new rocks (from volcanos such as Mt. Helens) give ages for these new rocks that say they are millions of years old. They'll test a rock, and if the test does not give the age they want, they try another test. We are looking at the same radiographic dating of rocks. The difference comes from how those facts are interpreted. One of the problems scientists face is picking the dating method that gives an age for the rock that is the age they want it to have. Learn the answers to these questions: What are the belief options for origins? Which side, creationism or evolutionism, has more evidence? Move To Assurance.- A Bible-Based Christian Ministry We have changed our name from Mission to America to Move To Assurance. #2 - It took millions of years to build up all those rock layers the fossils are buried in. #3 - There are scientific methods used to date rocks that tell us they are millions of years old. The problem is that using these methods you'll probably get 100 different ages for the rock.
But it seems like everything we learn from science tells us the world is billions of years old and the dinosaurs lived hundreds of millions of years ago.
For example, there is a museum that has a fossilized cowboy boot and a fossilized pickle from the 1950's.
Museums have fossils that are only a few decades old.
Would he have concluded that the fossil date for the sediments was wrong? Would he have thought that the radiometric dating method was flawed? Instead of questioning the method, he would say that the radiometric date was not recording the time that the rock solidified.
He may suggest that the rock contained crystals (called xenocrysts) that formed long before the rock solidified and that these crystals gave an older date.